Ten of the Best: Putters 2013 - Results

We test ten of the latest putters. Five blades take on five mallets but who comes out on top?

0

Share this Article



Conclusion

Following the test, we both scored each putter separately. We then discussed our thoughts and there were four putters we were chomping at the bit to talk about: PING Scottsdale TR Grayhawk, Yes! Callie 12, Nike MC02w and TaylorMade Daddy Long Legs.

While putting is extremely personal and many people will have contrasting views on the same putter, the PING Scottsdale TR Grayhawk was our victor on this occasion. It’s a reliable putter from a brand you can trust and although the appearance could be improved, it has all the aspects we crave in a putter. A perfect feel is combined with a true roll, with the ball coming off the face and rolling end over end seemingly straight away. It sits comfortably on the ground and the alignment aid makes it so easy to make those short putts drop. Even Charlie - who is partial to a short miss or two - was knocking them in for fun.

Yes! Callie 12 earns a silver overall but finished as the top blade. We strongly recommend this putter. TaylorMade's Daddy Long Legs earns Bronze and is closely followed by Nike's MC02w and Odyssey's Versa #7.

With all the latest modern technology on show, all the putters being tested were of exceptional standard and even the budget Dunlop NZ9 was good enough for a beginner. Try numerous putters before you buy in order to find the right one for your game but you won't go far wrong with any of these.

Click here for your chance to win the PING Scottsdale TR.

Index

To jump to the page of a particular putter, click the relevant link below...

Dunlop NZ9
Mizuno MP A302
Never Compromise Sub30
Nike Method Core
Odyssey Golf Versa #7
PING Scottsdale TR Grayhawk
Rife Iconic Z
TaylorMade Daddy Long Legs
Wilson Vizor
Yes! Callie 12

Your Say… 

Do you agree with our scores? Are you aghast that we chose the PING Scottsdale TR Grayhawk as the best? Are there any putters you felt should have been included? Tell us on the forum below.

More 2013 Equipment Reviews

The 10 Best Game improvement irons

The 10 Best Game improvement drivers

The 10 Best Player irons

The 10 Best Fairway woods

The 10 Best Hybrids

The 10 Best Golf Wedges

The most expensive putters

The cheapest putters

Photos courtesy of Sophie Powell

Andy and Charlie inspect the TaylorMade DLL
And then test it out

Share this Article

Previous page
Ten of the Best: Putters 2013 - Yes! Callie 12
Next article
Ten of the Best: Golf Wedges 2013

Discuss this story

We'd love you to add a comment! Please take half a minute to register as a free member
whilst i cant argue your findings as to your opinions of the putters tested ,i would be interested to know in what order you tested them ,and how much practice beforehand was had prior to your testing. im sure you must agree that the longer you putted on the same line to the same hole ,the later in the test the better that putter would score.

Posted: 08/05/2013 at 21:07

Charlie and I had about five minutes of practice beforehand with each of the ten putters. The test was then carried out in alphabetical order.

Potentially we knew the line better with the putters later in the test, as you mention, but then you could also argue we would have been getting more tired toward the end of the test. I therefore think we carried this out in the fairest and best way possible.

Posted: 08/05/2013 at 22:43

Hardly a scientific test then really?

Posted: 09/05/2013 at 10:16

I don't believe you, send the putters to me and I'll test them out again 

Posted: 09/05/2013 at 19:09

Lol. 

Very tiring that putting business  

Posted: 09/05/2013 at 19:41

Don't see what all the fuss is about folks.

"we survey ten top-end blade and mallet putters"

There's is a Dunlop in there but no Scotty Cameron I would have loaned you mine to make the test more "interesting"     

Posted: 11/05/2013 at 17:56

the obvious question for me is how did you "We selected our ten brands ..." for an article entitled Ten of the Best: Putters 2013......

Posted: 11/05/2013 at 19:44

Unfortunately Titleist did not want to be part of this test

Posted: 11/05/2013 at 21:56

Actual putts holed doesnt seem to have a massive correlation to the results either...

Posted: 28/05/2013 at 10:25

Andy Roberts wrote (see)
Unfortunately Titleist did not want to be part of this test


Its quite common that Titleist are very reluctant to let any of their prodcts near magazines (paper or online) for testing against others.

They must be scared that their products will be found to be inferior.

Posted: 28/05/2013 at 10:44

Oddjob: I don't think Mr. Cameron would agree that his putter line is inferior to other products, especially those named above (although Odyssey, Ping and Nike offer exceptional putters); I personally consider his Newport Select line the best. Rated by many golf pros and golf entities as one of the best, too.

Posted: 27/06/2013 at 16:59

BDAgolf wrote (see)
Oddjob: I don't think Mr. Cameron would agree that his putter line is inferior to other products, especially those named above (although Odyssey, Ping and Nike offer exceptional putters); I personally consider his Newport Select line the best. Rated by many golf pros and golf entities as one of the best, too.

I don't think he's saying that.  However, putters are a very personal thing and I know a few people who have bought Scotty's and then went back to their old putters as it was not the panacea they were hoping for.

I think he meant that if they go to the magazines it may burst some of the wonderul mysticism that goes around Scotty Camerons if the mags say yes it's very nice but....

- Brand A performed better in the test

- It's good but not 2 times the price better

- It wasn't that nice to use

A lot of tour pros are also now using Ping, Odyssey, Taylor Made, Rife, etc putters.

Scotty have built up a great image but I don't buy into it.  I am sure they are good but that much better than everyone else?

Posted: 27/06/2013 at 17:18

I swapped my Scotty for a Nike Method 1 for one game a couple of weeks ago. My mate went on holiday and he loaned me it to try whilst he was away.

TBH it seemed a half decent putter but I just couldn't get the feel for the ball from it. My previous Scotty (Laguna) had the same neck line so I was pretty familiar with the sight and position of the ball, but the weight of the strike wasn't something I could get right.

I did hole a few straight putts with it from about 3-4 feet but anything with a lot of break was nowhere near the cup.

My prototype has something that the Nike did not have, it's hard to explain, but I never felt confident standing over the ball, it was more of a hit it and hope with the Nike whereas with my Scotty I knew it would be in or very near the hole.

I also have a MD Golf Seve putter that I use in the crappy weather at the end of the year and that is, I'm afraid to say in the lower regions of the putter league, in fact I would put it in the non-league section, its that bad

For me, its going to be a Scotty all day, maybe its a bit of psychology I couldn't say but in all honesty I couldn't play with anything else every week.

Posted: 27/06/2013 at 19:35

It's all in the mind you know

Posted: 27/06/2013 at 19:37

Thing I notice about all these tests, drivers irons etc is that they never include the best club from last year so they must assume that progress is made very year!! I dont think any real progress has been made in putters in the last few years so where does the best putter from the last few years come in these tests.. for instance, IF I was in the market for a new putter I would want advice in whether I should buy a mid range priced this year putter or a discounted last year top range, they dont do that, ergo I can only assume that the tests are not neutral but are just a device to sell more units.. I would rather sift through this forums members opinions.

Posted: 28/06/2013 at 11:58

These are 2013 Club Tests - so that is why we are only taking equipment launched within the last 12 months. 

Posted: 28/06/2013 at 22:34

Oddjob (7.6) wrote (see)
Andy Roberts wrote (see)
Unfortunately Titleist did not want to be part of this test


Its quite common that Titleist are very reluctant to let any of their prodcts near magazines (paper or online) for testing against others.

They must be scared that their products will be found to be inferior.

Yeah Bricking themselves no doubt!

Posted: 30/06/2013 at 00:40

BDAgolf wrote (see)
Oddjob: I don't think Mr. Cameron would agree that his putter line is inferior to other products, especially those named above (although Odyssey, Ping and Nike offer exceptional putters); I personally consider his Newport Select line the best. Rated by many golf pros and golf entities as one of the best, too.


I wasnt actually referring to SC specifically but to Titleist in general.

Titleist are renowned for being reluctant to release product for such "group tests" by magazines.

I've heard them comment that they dont feel that their products would be given the best opportunity to perform as well as they can, under the normal style of "hit six balls and measure the results" sort of test that magazines often conduct.

 

Posted: 30/06/2013 at 10:45

Andy, I have been looking at getting the nike method putter mentioned in this review. I see that the review states that the best price was £77. Would you be able to tell me where this was from?

Cheers
Rob

Posted: 26/07/2013 at 18:28