Features
You are looking at: Home : Features

We're Augusta, so mind your own business!

New boss, old habits as Masters chairman responds to criticism of club's attitudes


Posted: 5 April 2007
by Paul Mahoney in Augusta

US Masters 2007
New order, old attitudes: Billy Payne (right) with former chairman Hootie Johnson

UK-based freelance journalist Paul Mahoney is reporting daily on the Masters for Golfmagic.com. Here's the first of his exclusive commentaries from Augusta National.

THE TRADITIONAL address by the chairman of Augusta National on the eve of the Masters had a fresh appeal this year. New boss Billy Payne has taken over from the often controversial and confrontational Hootie Johnson.

Johnson is the man, remember, who rowed publicly in 2002 with Martha Burke of the National Council of Women’s Organisations, who challenged the club’s lack of any women members.

Payne is seen as a more progressive, approachable chairman who was instrumental in bringing the 1996 Olympic Games to Atlanta during his time on the city’s Olympic committee.

Payne has increased television coverage this year, embraced new media and allowed webcams to show live footage from Amen Corner on the tournament's official website www.masters.org.

US Masters 2007
Sunday driver: Payne with Arnold Palmer

But, just in case you think the club is finally ready to embrace the 21st century, some old Augusta National habits are hard to kick.

Will we ever see a woman member of Augusta? Payne was asked.

“As I’ve said many times, all members and membership matters are subject to the private deliberations of the members and, other than that, sir, I’m simply not going to talk about it.” Ouch!

Just to follow that up, asked another, there is a bill in Congress that would take tax breaks away from members of private clubs that discriminate on the basis of religion, race or gender. Any comment?

“None whatsoever.” Ouch again!

And lastly, a third inquisitor prodded, are you often approached with ideas to make things better, that you find yourself rejecting?

“We don’t have a suggestion box,” said Payne to much laughter.

In other words: 'it's our club, it's our tournament, so mind your own business!'

Golf club committees – don’t you just love ‘em!

Tell us your views on Augusta National's attitudes on the forum, for a chance to win one of five square headed drivers we're giving away this week.


Previous article Previous article:
Luke Donald's US Masters Diary
Next article:Next article
We test Lefty's driver

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Discuss this story

Would Augusta National's attitudes to thorny subjects of discrimination be tolerated in the UK? Or do they have the right to do as they please? Do you care, as long as you can watch televised golf on a pretty course with the world's best taking part? ED
Posted: 05/04/2007 09:03

With enough money and the right political cronies of course they could get away with it in the UK.

The press might occasionally give them a hard time and there might be some political lobbying but if yo have a thick skin and a sod you attitude then complaints would not even register.

Hopefully we have grown out of that mindset in the UK.
Posted: 05/04/2007 09:20

At the end of the day, it's about finance. If the television companies and the various tours said to Augusta National "we will no longer give coverage of your even until you change your rules" the guys at August would see their cash cow dry up and would be forced to change.

I think that this was the way in which Lords (cricket) was forced to acept women members because the govt said if they didn't they would not get any lottery funding.

As a private members club they have the right to decide who they will admit or not, but similarly, everyone else then has the right to boycott them.

Of course, I can never see the US tv networks boycotting the event. The pressure probably needs to come from the top players, perhaps by making a decision not to attend. If the world's top 20 all stayed away to protest at their discrimination, then perhaps they would take note.
Posted: 05/04/2007 10:41

It still happens and originated in the UK IMO. Loch Lomond is a private club by invitation only with one of the royals (Andrew I think) being honourary captain, and courses like Bruntsfiled Links in Edinburgh and Muirfield still I believe have no lady members and allow play only with gentlemen at certain times. Brilliant as it is, how a course like Muirfield can even be allowed to still host The Open when it has restrictions such as this taken from the booking website is beyond me.

'Ladies

* Ladies may only play if accompanied by a gentleman player
* Changing facilities are available for ladies at the west end of the clubhouse
* There are no lunch facilities for ladies but sandwiches and drinks can be provided in the Captain's Room, if ordered in advance'
Whilst its good to still have a mens bar / or ladies lounge if required at the exclusive clubs, golf is now a sport for all and should accommodate all equally. I wouldn't be surprised if there are no 'African' members at Muirfield either!
Posted: 05/04/2007 12:02

It is unfortunate that this 'age of the dinosaur' thinking continues to take away from the best major championship of the year. I was hoping that a change in leadership would result in changing attitudes, I guess not. I wish the PGA players took a more active role in this issue.
Posted: 05/04/2007 16:15

I wonder how the same set of men would react if a women only golf course/club sprung up?

A bad joke for you:

A black man, a woman, a Jew and a crippled white man with no arms have a friendly competition with each other at Augusta. Who wins?

The crippled white guy of course since the others wouldn't get through the door!
Posted: 05/04/2007 19:17

If as a private club Augusta continue to impose these rules it seems there is nothing that can be legally done to stop them.

However, by continuing to use the club as a venue for a PGA tournament, and more importantly as one of the majors, the PGA is supporting this, even if indirectly.

If Augusta wish to continue to stage a tournament at this time of year then that would be up to them BUT it should do it independently and with no support from the governing authorities.

Posted: 05/04/2007 19:18

One thing that does bother me is no women members at augusta?
An exclusive club I can understand but not this?

How easy this could be changed even ( by discrimination levels) by inviting the best on the womens tour, kinda a wpga womens masters hosted bt the augusta national club.

I'd be intrested to see just how many woman have played this course to date.


Posted: 05/04/2007 19:23

Trev

I don't think the current venues for womens majors would be too happy if Augusta opened its doors to womens tournaments. But I bet the female players would be delighted.
Posted: 05/04/2007 19:30


Taz
Much as I do not like the insular backward thinking of Augusta National, or indeed the aforementioned clubs in the UK - I do admire their stubbornness.

If I and 20 or so like minded mates bought and developed a private golf course and club house in the UK, for our own use, I wouldn't want interfering do gooders telling me I had to change my constitution - just because they didn't feel it was politically correct to be exclusive.


Posted: 06/04/2007 09:44

UK law doesn't prevent any club or golf club from being 'male only'. So, it could and does happen here.

I'm not that bothered about the way the Augusta committee behave, the golf is the main thing. I just think it's contradictory when they say they want to have the best field in golf when they allow players to play there and shoot in the 90s. One of the older players had a total score of 340 once! I like seeing the older players play, but it's depriving younger players from getting in, I could name at least a dozen top players who have been deprived of a chance of playing this week due to the right of former champions to play until they die. No disrespect to them, but it makes a mockery of the tournament and it stops the younger players from playing. Why not let the former champions, who haven't qualified through any of the other criteria, to play the week before.
Posted: 06/04/2007 15:01

as far as I'm concerned and in respect of the Masters tournament they still have the right to do as they please

in far too many other walks of life (and again it's become the 'modern' fashion) we're constantly told what to do by some liberalised sit in the middle & straght down the centre of the line government quango - gets right up my pipe !!

you must do this that way so as not to offend X when most of the time X couldn't give an arse about it anyway because the topic in question holds no interest to them -- I'll be damned if I'd want to see the Masters conform just so it fits into some politically correct ethos that allows the likes of Miss Wie step on the course
Posted: 06/04/2007 19:11

Agree with Paul W, above. A private club must have the right to do as it pleases. If someone wants to start a club which bars, women, men, black people, white people, muslims, jews, christians, etc etc. Then it must have a perfect right to do so. As long as it does not have its paw out for any money from the public purse, then i for one would vigorously defend its right to do so. Surely at the end of the day that is what freedom and democracy are all about. Freeedom must mean freedom for all, not just the ones we personally agree with.
Posted: 07/04/2007 06:46

I agree with Paul W and Darryl. It is and should be the perogative of any private club to set the rules in regard to its own organization.
FYI there is a private women only club in Canada. Just as strict about admission as Augusta.
Further, if they want to put pressure on the club by withdrawing the financial support, it will not change a thing. The club has more than sufficient resources to carry on indefinitely.
Further (again) I don't think that the women could play this course without looking incompetent, weak, foolish etc. Look at the stats --- women are not as good putters/chipper and they don't have the length to play the course even from the front tees.


Posted: 07/04/2007 12:05

I think the point is being missed here.

Augusta has the right to do as they please. They are foolish for doing so but I will defend their right to be fools.

But isn't the point this. This is a Major. It's not supposed to PC, it's not about the money or ranking points.

It's about one thing - BEING THE BEST.

The reason it's a Major is the history, the status. This is Bobby Jones course, the greatest player there has ever been, his course.
You could takeaway the money, the PGA status and the best players would still turn up to add their name to the trophy.

They say there are four Majors. There aren't, there are 3.
Augusta + US Open + The Open.

The USPGA should be cancelled as a MAjor and the fourth redesignated to another non US country.
Posted: 09/04/2007 22:28

It is a private members club paid for by the members and as such I think it should be within their rights to accept or not as the case may be anyone they like .
Posted: 10/04/2007 09:12

We'd love you to add a comment! Please take half a minute to register as a free member

Become a member and join in the forum!
Calendar

Track your game

Free golf score and handicap tracker. Record your stats,
analyse your round,
improve your game!
Click here
Calendar