That's a lovely swing, really compact and efficient looking.

It's much better than mine.

Lawman

Whilst being fawningly complimentary to Golfer 24 you should be aware that YOUR swing must be pretty good to be able to achieve the same handicap.Unless, that is, you have a SUPERB short game and putt like Tiger!

As I have argued ad infinitum a "pretty" or "lovely" swing never guarantees that it will bring the clubhead square into the ball on a constant basis with optimum power for the length and type of the required shot!

I have always respected golfers with EFFICIENT swings far more than those with PRETTY swings and during my tournament years the former beat the latter most of the time!

Yes, but given the choice, i want efficient AND pretty!

anyway, the guys swing looks to me as if he doesn't have to depend too much on timing or form. There doesn't look to be too much to go wrong. I do not know if it is true, but it looks like a pretty repeatable swing to me.

I'm stuffed then (literally) cos I make Golfer24 look like Karen Carpenter on her way out!

I'll fetch me coat!

Creo

That's a non sequitur!

Unless your swing is efficient the ball just will not go where you intend.

Sorry old mate!

Creo, it looks OK to me, and works well for you. 

This is getting back round to , looking good Vs feel again.

I think a good looking swing has more chance of repition than a swish turn swish swing. Golfer24 looks pritty and repatable, but is it producing low scores? no end to this debate

Nature Vs Nurture