Slope question

6 posts / 0 new
Slope question

Some members of my club think that when the Slope system eventually comes in that all roll up social scores will be recorded for handicap purposes. But like most clubs that have casual roll ups, putts are given, not played on a measured course, when in groups of 4 have match plays and stableford simultaneously and team games too. I have even been told this will be acceptable to our Authorities.

Can anyone clarify or give a view on this please?

It is certain that more

It is certain that more scores will be used than in the current CONGU or EGA 'qualifier' systems. The details of just what are still being thrashed out but it will certainly be a move towards the US system of 'all scores'. It is possible that individual national authorities will be able to pick and choose but as I say there is still a lot of talking to be done and everthing is being kept close to the chest. Little is being leaked.

My members club has

My members club has approximately 20 different unofficial roll ups, none have to putt out. If this has to change for scores to be recorded I worry about our course being even more clogged up with the pace of play and if the structure has to change, affecting enjoyment to many.

I add we do not have official tee times and all roll ups are just word of mouth.

Roll up structures:

A few larger ones, up to 40 members, that play for a lot of money for winners, playing match play and stableford simultaneously and team games. These larger ones have a history of putting pressure on handicaps to cut persistent winners who have failed to do well in the sufficient amount of medal qualifiers required, according to the UHS

Some, up to 18 members, play for much less money but inevitably have larger gimmes

Some that play only as teams, best 2 scores from 3 or 4, obviously playing as teams they have even larger gimmes

Some that play as teams but sometimes change to individual and then if numbers allow, play in 4BBB format

This must be reflected all over the country at other clubs, how do they get around this culture in the US?

I guess they don't. As I

I guess they don't. As I understand it, most golf in North America is played as singles stroke play; albeit with various complicated side bets.

But I reckon that the various non USGA handicapping authorities are aware of what happens in their neck of the woods.

Very different in US

I had 8 years in the US before returning to the UK, and played golf during those years. I found the handicapping system was very different.

What amazed me most was that scores in all rounds of golf, including the most casual friendlies, should be submitted for handicap purposes. And I should submit scores when playing alone. (That last point - counting scores in solo golf - changed in 2016, but in the face of many protests.) Also, that incomplete rounds should be assessed for handicap, providing a minimum number of holes had been played.

But - relevant to the issue of this post - there is also provision in the USGA system to allow for conceded putts. Here's an extract from their manual:

Most Likely Score

A "most likely score" is the score a player must post for handicap purposes if a hole is started but not completed or if the player is conceded a stroke. The most likely score consists of the number of strokes already taken plus, in the player's best judgment, the number of strokes the player would take to complete the hole from that position more than half the time. This number may not exceed the player's Equitable Stroke Control limit. (See Section 4-3.)

 

With a smile I note that the estimate of the number of strokes that will be taken to complete the hole is made by the player, not the player's golfing buddies.

The way to stop all these

The way to stop all these bluddy bandits, for it is they who cause all the hassle, is that when anyone wins a comp, their handicap is reduced to what they played top. FULL STOP! If you can play to it once you can do it again.I've no sympathy whatsoever and will not accept any arguement against this idea, for there is none apart from bandits.