Instruction articles
You are looking at: Home : Instruction articles

What you can learn from US Open

Rough escapes, chipping, course management, lag putts - so much to teach us


Posted: 19 June 2007
by Peter Pringle

Learn from US Open  at Oakmont
Chipping was a key shot to save par (Mark Newcombe/Visions in Golf)

It's a little known fact that half of Oakmont's 400 active members have handicaps in single figures. So why did the course that hosted last week's US Open pose such a problem for the world's best golfers?

The United States Golf Association, the tournament's organising authority had much to do with the degree of difficulty - narrowing the fairways, allowing the rough to grow and speeding up the greens - ensuring that the pros who qualified had their game tested to the extreme.

But when faced with tough conditions on their own course, should club golfers be in much trepidation if they learn a few basic skills about handling themselves and the elements?

Here's a few tips on how to escape from the type of places that Oakmont included in its examination.

Escaping from deep rough

Use your own sensible judgement as to a realistic distance you can carry the ball back into play on the short grass, faced with the depth and thickness of the grass around the ball.

A shorter, heavier iron - a wedge or sand iron - should give you a more direct route back into play for a ball in the deepest of lies. Ensure you deliver a sharp, steep angle of attack to get quick elevation.

With slightly improved lies, opt for 9- or 8-iron but make sure you take a firm grip so the club head doesn't twist in your hands at impact.

Learn from US open at Oakmont
Mickelson hacks from the tough Oakmont rough (Mark Newcombe/Visions in golf)

...and from semi-rough (first cut)

Though you're irritated to have only missed the fairway by a few inches don't be tempted into blasting the ball with a straight-faced club.

This type of lie demands a certain amount of finesse and will tend to fly a little further when grass gets trapped between the ball and the face of the club.

Consider a little more loft in your club selection than the distance to your target area demands and swing easy.

Deep-faced fairway bunkers

At Oakmont the bunkers were not only numerous but often deep. They were strategically-placed to cause indecision as to whether a player risked getting enough elevation and power to reach the green or fall into more trouble.

The alternative was to play out safe and leave an appropriate yardage in an attempt to save par with a short iron and a putt.

Many opted for the risky option and fell foul of the deep rough and sloping lies around the green.

Face with a good lie towards the back of a fairway bunker with not too much lip to it, waggle your feet into a solid stance, grip down on the handle and concentrate on the front of the ball (nearest your target). This will help nip it off the surface with minimal sand. Remember, too to keep leg movement to a minimum, swing easily and retain your height through the swing.

If the ball is towards the face of the bunker, opt for a sand iron and make sure you at least get the ball back into play. Your handicap strokes are there for a reason. Use them!

Chipping uphill

Many players at Oakmont, when the ball rolled off the slippery greens found themselves faced with an uphill lie with the ball settled in rough just below the surface.

Not only did it create problems getting the ball out but also forced an awkward stance.

Faced with chipping from an a uphill lie, don't lean into the hill as this de-lofts the club and can send the ball too far. Your weight should favour your right side (for a right-hander) with shoulders parallel to the slope and the ball forward in your stance.

Take a light grip and keep the follow-through short for better control. The ball should pop up and stop quickly.

Learn from US open at Oakmont
Nick Dougherty - sensible use of the hybrid off many tees (Mark Newcombe/Visions in Golf)

Avoid compounding mistakes

If you make a bad swing or your escape shot fails to clear the rough at the first attempt. Don't get flustered. Re-group your thoughts, concentrate and go through your routine.

Bubba Watson made an elementary mistake at the 9th hole in the third round of the US Open while in contention and didn't take his time when he fluffed a chip from greenside rough. It cost him a triple bogey which could have been avoided and was crucial to his finishing position.

Keep it in the fairway

When the rough's high it's important to keep your driving under control.

With a straight-faced driver that's more difficult, so when the fairways are narrow, consider opting for a 3-wood or hybrid club from the tee. It might leave you further back but you're on the short grass and able to control your approach far better than a leaked drive into the rough.

Lag putts on fast greens

The greens at Oakmont were running between 12 and 13.5 on the stimpmeter - that's faster than Augusta National - reputedly the fastest greens on the planet.

A stimpmeter is used by officials to roll a ball down a chute at a set height and the distance the ball rolls on a flat part of the green in feet (an average of opposite directions) determines the unit of pace on the green (e.g. a reading of '12' on the stimpmeter reveals that an average of 12 feet was achieved).

Few greens in the UK reach that kind of speed, apart from a handful of dry seaside links, but when the greens are fast, distance control is often more vital than direction. Work on your speed of putt to ensure you at least get the ball within the equivalent of an imaginary 2ft circle around the hole. Avoiding a 3-putts can be a score-saver.


Previous article Previous article:
Five win Benross V6 drivers
Next article:Next article
Shrek set of headcovers could be yours

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Discuss this story

Tell us what YOU learned from watching the US Open. Are you better equipped to improve your strategy, putting, chipping and bunker escapes?
Posted: 19/06/2007 12:54

Yep simple, , dont bother playing Oakmont as it could have long term psycological effects, , :O) :O) :O)

But seriously, , i watched all of every round and it facinated me as to how many fairways the Pros actually missed with irons, , it was probably the course set up but, its a good BUT, , i think now that position is more inportant that just booming it down there and hopeing, , , the 1 iron might just work its way back into my bag, , :O)




Posted: 19/06/2007 15:42

What surprised me was that a dodgy putter actually won the thing! I can't remember which hole it was, but he made such a poor stroke at one, I thought "he's gibbed it now." But he pulled through. Fair play to Angel though, he drives it like a god, makes it look soooo effortless, and seems a likeable sort.

Without wishing to detract from Angel's efforts by raising the "Cabrera din't win it, it was Tiger wot lost it" line of thought, I have a theory (completely unsupported by any evidence that I have) - Tiger hasn't won a major from behind after 54 holes because he frightens his playing partner so much, that they play poorly, therefore not inspiring the annointed one.

Anyone got another Baddeley-like example, or an example that disproves my theory?
Posted: 19/06/2007 15:53

Luke donald.


I learned that smoking and eating lots is the way forward. Far easier than fitting into a Tiger mock :)
Posted: 19/06/2007 16:27

spot on, my portley, slouched, chainsmoking physique now seems far better suited to golf than before.

Realistically there is nothing I learnt from the vent that I didn't know already. Obvious one being just how much better the pro's are than us mere mortals.
Posted: 19/06/2007 17:34

I learnt that smoking and eating lots is the way forward ages ago and now reluctantly have to continually stuff myself and chain smoke for the sake of my golf game. It does work.
Posted: 19/06/2007 18:36

snouts are the future ! .. and have been for years - thought everybody knew that

the benefits of nicotine on the metabolism can work wonders and fags can have a general calming effect for those that are on the edge of being highly strung - naturally there are other downsides but there are to everything from stuff we're likely to eat to drinks we drink to stepping out the front door and sitting in a car seat that's wrong for you ,the government continually tell us there's something wrong with everything !

look at the amount of Doctors & Nurses + other NHS staff you see chain smoking like laboratory beagles when they get a free minute -- it's an instant hit for calming the nerves

I didn't learn anything from the US Open -- what I do know is Cabrera is a top bloke ! -- he does his own thing and more power to his elbow for doing so :0)

as a marketing mans 'model' for a 21st century golfer that needs to be packaged & sold to the public to generate ££££s for some corporate faceless twat he ticks 'no' boxes -- that in itself is a breath of fresh air , the fact he smokes makes it even better :0))))
Posted: 19/06/2007 19:54

On a serious not I think the one thing that everyone knows but no one likes which was demonstrated a lot at Oakmont, was that if you're in the real thick stuff with a crummy lie, don't bother doing anything but chipping back to the fairway.

I saw a lot of guys try to hit the green in regulation from the rubbish, and it ended the majority of their rounds!
Posted: 19/06/2007 21:03

(Before my recollection - still in short trousers!) but, I have been told that, down the stretch at a very important golf tournament in 1977, someone who did rather well was puffing on a joint. Obviously worked for them as well!
Posted: 20/06/2007 07:35

i learned alot about chipping out of the rough from around the green, every shot i saw was a pop up, hitting gown into the ground with no follow through i got to try that.
Posted: 20/06/2007 08:40

I had a piece of information reinforced - namely, that even the best pros make bad shots. What matters is the recovery you make from the bad shots.
Posted: 20/06/2007 08:50

oh i also learnt that when your on the 17th level with the eventual winner, u dont take a driver on a short par 4 which has rough up to your ankles all around it, and even if u hit the green it would fly off, cause its faster than light. DOH
Posted: 20/06/2007 09:59

The only thing I've learned this year from the top tournaments is that Pros will not change their strategies or shot choice. Come hell or high water.
Posted: 20/06/2007 10:29

Nothing wrong with asking the top players to play difficult shots, tempt them with risk/reward shots. Oakmont got it right as opposed to the Shinnecock fiasco where it was just tricked up. I believe Oakmont slowed the greens down from what the members get so no questions over the trickery there. Disagree with a previous comment about Tiger losing the US Open-the player who plays the course best wins the tournament, Angel did that and deserves all the plaudits he gets.
Posted: 22/06/2007 15:47

Learned that it's not really a lot of fun watching pro's look foolish on putting greens so different from normal. Okay, there's no definition of normal, and the members at Oakmont pride themselves on having even slicker greens. More fool they, imo.

My point is only that I almost felt embarrassed for some great players struggling to get down in three putts - and that's just not fun.
Posted: 24/06/2007 23:37

By the way, and apologies for being a bit off topic - how often has someone playing Ping won a major before? I vaguely recall, a few years back, being told no-one with Ping in their bag had won a major. Maybe someone has in recent times. If not, they have now.
Posted: 24/06/2007 23:55

Did Calcavecchia at the Open played Ping, possibly in '92?
Posted: 25/06/2007 11:43

Now that the US Open is gone does anyone have any thoughts on who will win The Open at Carnoustie. I played the Championship Course last week and it is in fantastic shape. The rough is there and is completely fair and the stands just make the place even more special. Any thoughts who will follow Armour, Cotton, Hogan, Player, Watson and Lawrie?
Posted: 25/06/2007 11:49

Who will win The Open? Almost anyone, it seems! Who would have predicted either of the winners of the first two 2007 Majors?

Of the Brits Rose and Casey do seem to be rising to the top. Others aren't far away, but don't look very much like winning. But, there again, neither did Johnson or Cabrera look like winners, nor Lawrie in '99.

Funny to think that Father Woods is the nearly man of the majors so far.
Posted: 25/06/2007 22:07

In answer to the "has another Ping player won a major?", well, was it Calcavecchia? Come on, the suspense is killing me!;-)

Also, hindsight is a wonderful thing, but Cabrera has been improving, contending and winning some bigger tournaments in the last couple of years, and of the four sub-par rounds at the US Open, he had two of 'em.

Plus (without checking up), I think his final round was the lowest of anyone in the top 20 or so - deserved winner indeed.
Posted: 26/06/2007 07:55

In answer to the "has another Ping player won a major?", well, was it Calcavecchia? Come on, the suspense is killing me!;-)

yes , Big Calc' in The Open 1989

previous to that Bob Tway , 1986 USPGA , the one where he holed his bunker shot on the 18th to pip Greg Norman to the title :0) .... laugh , I nearly handed my fags out !

not forgetting just about all the major winners prior to copycat Cameron coming along who have used Ping putters
Posted: 26/06/2007 19:37

We'd love you to add a comment! Please take half a minute to register as a free member

Become a member and join in the forum!
Calendar

Track your game

Free golf score and handicap tracker. Record your stats,
analyse your round,
improve your game!
Click here
Calendar