News
You are looking at: Home : News

The Open: Change of Rules for ex-champions

Norman, Watson lead R&A to offer second chance to Over 60s


Posted: 16 November 2009
by Bob Warters

open golf
Tom Watson approaches the final hole at the 2009 Open

The successive feats of Greg Norman and Tom Watson in almost winning The Open championship in the last two years, despite being in their 50s, has led the R&A to change its entry exemption rules for the event.

Under previous rules, Watson (59) would have been almost automatically inelligible for the 2011 Open at Royal St George's, despite showing his superb form at Turnberry this year and only losing to Stewart Cink in a play-off. In 2008 Norman led the Open after 54 holes in his 50th year.

open golf
Greg Norman - so close in 2008

However, with the 150th anniversary Open due to be played at St Andrews from July 15-18 in 2010, the R&A has revealed that a new exemption category has been introduced. Condition F(4) now exempts from qualifying any past Open champions who have finished in the top 10 and ties in any of the previous five Open Championships, thus effectively providing them with a five year exemption into the Open.

Though without mentioning Norman and Watson specifically, Peter Dawson, Chief Executive of The R&A, said: "We have introduced this exemption as a direct response to seeing two of our great Open Champions, both in their fifties, challenging to win our championship these last two years.

"We rightly reduced the age of exemption for past champions from 65 to 60 two years ago and our intention was never to remove players still at the top of their game from competing in The Open.”

Norman won the Open twice - in 1986 (Turnberry) and 1993 (Royal St Georges), while Watson has won it five times - 1975 (Carnoustie), 1977 (Turnberry), 1980 (Muirfield), 1982 (Royal Troon) and 1983 (Royal Birkdale).

Without the change, the only way for a player over the age of 60 to be exempt was as the current British Seniors champion or to have finished among the leading players and ties of the previous Open.

FOOTNOTE: Competitors at The Open Championship, International final qualifying in Australasia, Asia, America and Europe and at Local final qualifying will be subject to the new clubface groove regulations as per Decision 4-1/1 of Decisions on the Rules of Golf, says the R&A.

Tell us on the forum: With exemptions tilted toward previous high finishers, current Tour players in the World rankings and Tour-based International qualifying, has The Open reduced too much, the opportunity for regional pros and elite amateurs to win a place in the event. Currently only a dozen places are available from local qualifying.


Previous article Previous article:
New grooves: Tales from the workshop
Next article:Next article
Free golf for military personnel

TwitterStumbleUponFacebookDiggRedditGoogle

Discuss this story

With exemptions tilted toward previous high finishers, current Tour players in the World rankings and Tour-based International qualifying, has The Open reduced too much, the opportunity for regional pros and elite amateurs to win a place in the event. Currently only a dozen places are available from local qualifying.
Posted: 16/11/2009 11:14

It's all about getting the most 'big' names in - so the crowd is biiger and tv audiences are bigger

Who wants to watch Joe Smith from xyz golf club - who only his members have heard of - when they could let in a 'big' name - such as ............ (fill in your own blank) who currently lies 33rd on the Asian/Australian/South Pole or wherever order of merit


Posted: 16/11/2009 11:25

DIS - The number of golfing fans that would want the opposite of your scenario might suprise you, or at least I hope it would. Mind you, its not up to you and me is it? Probably more to do with The Open's sponsors than the fans. It's a shame because we all love the cinderalla stories, or even just the possibility of one.

The Open is heading in the wrong direction for me. The ratio of regional qualfiers to tour golfers needs addressing and if that means an age limit on past champions then so be it - and by the by Norman wasnt that old and I'll wager (joking o'course) there isnt a repeat of Watsons performance next year.

The Open and the US Open shouldnt be contradictory of themselves. They should be as they always were - Opens.


Posted: 16/11/2009 13:49

I agree that there should be more "romantic" entries. The Open should be just that, Open to more qualifiers.

 While it is great to have the big names we also need the dream.

Remember that spotty kid who nearly won the Open as an amatuer - Justin Rose. How great was that !


Posted: 16/11/2009 22:47

Totally agree. The Open is a unique opportunity for the Cinderella story. The big names, seniors etc currently have and have had in the past plenty of Majors and big tournaments exclusively tailored for them.

It gives the Open a uniqueness that more recently formed tournaments could never solicit or sustain


Posted: 16/11/2009 23:25

We'd love you to add a comment! Please take half a minute to register as a free member

Become a member and join in the forum!
Calendar

Track your game

Free golf score and handicap tracker. Record your stats,
analyse your round,
improve your game!
Click here
Calendar