Deep-faced drivers clash head on
We compare the Ping Si3 340cc driver with the Integra Viktory II with its money-back guarantee.
Ping Si3 340cc driver.
|
Ping Si3 340 v Integra Viktory II Forged Titanium
Price: Ping £399 (graphite shaft), Integra £149 (graphite)
During the last few weeks I’ve been trying to get to grips with two recent additions to the plethora of drivers which seem to be competing for our attention.
In the last 12 years, I’ve tried more drivers than a long-suffering British School of Motoring instructor and have yet to find one with which I have been totally happy.
My golf was initiated in the 1970s, when I bought a set of second hand clubs, which included a steel shafted, persimmon-headed Ben Sayers driver. I carried it in my bag for years, but rarely used it – the big fluffy yellow pom-pom head cover merely identified that I had one.
I’m still none the wiser after comparing Ping’s Si3 340cc and the Viktory II 370cc from Integra – neither of which I could strike with any real consistency.
Unlike a number of the latest ball-thumpers with claimed lower centre of gravity, neither was easy for me to get airborne. Granted, I’m a handsy type of golfer who delivers a low, penetrating flight with my irons most suited to links courses. But shots with these two clubs rarely flew higher than a bungalow chimney pot.
On occasions my ego was massaged with drives that bounded along as if on an airport runway but in the recent dry conditions, against mates who are not usually longer than me, I was still playing my approach shots first.
Let’s look first at the Ping with its thermoplastic hosel which allows club fitters to match a driver or fairway wood to any golfer's swing with different lie angles, helping them correct hooks and slices to achieve the best possible ball flight. Mine was supplied based on info provided, as best I could, over the telephone, so perhaps wasn’t perfect for me.
The sound off the deep forged 340cc face ( a new 380cc version is soon to be released) was almost as quiet and soft as the persimmon heads I remember and the blue grafalloy light weight shaft was certainly easy to swing.
But, contrary to the claims that the head was confidence-inspiring, I didn’t find it so, or particularly forgiving. Mishits finished where mishits should – shortish and rightish, with the occasional straight nobbler off the bottom of the club, which stung the fingers.
|
Integra Viktory II.
|
The Viktory II comes from the same stable as the monster Integra Super Forged 450 Bti driver and at a more affordable price than most big-hitting weapons on the market.
Integra Golf UK even offers your money back if the Viktory II doesn’t strike the ball longer and straighter than your current driver.
Head to head it was 5-10 yards longer than the Ping Si3 but again didn’t inspire confidence and was even less forgiving. Several others of similar stature and handicap wouldn’t swap it for their Cobra SS 430s.
One told me: "Once you’ve got used to a big flat head sitting there, the 370cc head on the Viktory II, with its deep face, makes it look more like a 3-wood and you’ve really got to hammer it to get the distance. And that leads to mishits."
Integra’s Vinnie Ball makes a sound point when he says: "We think ‘good value for money’ has been overlooked in golf club retail. It’s insulting to the golfer to be charged up to £450 for the latest offering only to see it on sale for £150 in the golf discount superstores six months later. That’s why we offer a money-back guarantee if customers aren’t satisfied."
My final benchmark was to try to hit both off the deck – which has become a bit of an obsession, if not a speciality of mine. Neither performed well but to be honest I didn’t expect it. Hitting off a tall tee peg was difficult enough.
| |
Verdict
|
With its distinctive black and blue simulated leather headcover and blue shaft, the Ping Si3 looks the business, and the feel off the face when struck well produced a dampened feedback, but the 10 degree version I tested didn’t deliver the flight characteristics I’d expected. In comparison, the Viktory II looked good value for money and was longer off the tee – but for me, lacked the forgiveness I’d seek.
| |
Golfmagic rating: Ping Si3 8/10; Integra Viktory II 7.5/10
|
|
Discuss this story
The factors which effect Trajectory can be listed as such:
Major Factors - Loft, Set Makeup
Medium Factors - Face Progression/Hosel Offset (woods), Centre of Gravity
Minor Factors - Face Angle, Shaft Flex, Shaft Bend Point, Shaft Torque, Face Progression/Hosel Offset (irons), Weight Distribution
The three factors which are discussed more than any others are loft, centre of gravity and weight distribution.
Loft is a major factor of trajectory in the woods. The greater the loft, the higher the shot; the lesser the loft, the lower the shot.
Centre of gravity is a medium factor of trajectory. The lower the CG of the clubhead in relation to the CG of the ball at impact, the higher the trajectory of the shot. In woods, the farther back from the clubface the CG is, the higher the trajectory will be.
Weight distribution is a minor factor of trajectory. Weight distribution will only effect trajectory if the distribution is such that enough mass is low on the clubhead to effect a low CG.
To hit the ball lower consider decreasing the loft, lowering the centre of gravity, and choosing a set of woods with an offset hosel. While the other specifications do have some effect on hitting the ball lower, their effect is minimal and can only be a factor if that specification in the previous set was very badly matched to your needs.
Posted: 23/09/2003 22:25
|
|
