Group Test: The latest wedges
The spin doctors check out what's new among the scoring clubs
Posted: 1 August 2008
by Nick Bayly
Did our panel of testers sharpen up their
short games with the latest Tour-inspired performance wedges or did
they come up short? We tested steel-shafted 56-degree Callaway
X-Forged, Cleveland CG14, Nike SV, Ping W Tour, Taylormade Z TP and
Titleist Spin Milled Vokey wedges with a range of bounces (10-, 12-,
and 14-degrees).
|
The testing panel(from the left):
Lynton Smith
Age: 46
Handicap: 11
Home Club: Banburgh Golf Club, Norfolk
Lee Carpenter
Handicap: 13
Home Club: Chichester Golf club, E.Sussex
Nick Bayly
Handicap: 12
Home Club: Horsham Golf & Fitness, West Sussex
|
 |
|
Contact: |
www.callawaygolf.com |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Loft
options: |
50, 52, 54, 56, 58 and 60 degrees. |
|
 |
 |
|
Price: |
£89 (chrome), £99 (vintage) |
|
 |
| Callaway says: Designed by Roger Cleveland and
available in 12 loft and bounce combinations with Tour-proven precision for the more accomplished
golfer. Forged from soft carbon steel for exceptional touch and feel
around the green. The 58- and
60-degree models feature the special C-Grind (with specific feedback from
Phil Mickelson), making them extremely versatile performers. Also
feature unique ‘Mack Daddy’ grooves, an aggressively-sized but
conforming groove that maximises spin, trajectory and distance control.
Available in satin chrome or vintage finish.
Lynton says:The clubhead sits well behind the ball and
I liked the teardrop shaped head. The 14-degree bounce in this model
made it hard to cut through the firm turf so I was more likely to thin
the ball when trying to nip it off the top. Felt much better on full
shots.
|

Callaway
Big Bertha
|
|
Lee says: Can’t quite put my finger on it but never
entirely comfortable with this club. I wasn’t blown away by its finish
and it just didn’t give me the feel that I got from some of the other
models.
Nick says: I really liked the straight leading edge,
which not only helped with alignment, but gave the impression that you
could nip the ball cleaner off the surface than some of the more
rounded edges of its rivals. The satin chrome finish
made it look a little less flash than others but it’s by
no means dull. The spin I was able to generate, especially when
switching to a three-piece ball, was superb, with even short chips
checking up quickly, though falling short of sucking back! It felt soft
and solid as you’d expect from a forged head, with even miss-hits not
feeling too harsh. Sound at impact was a muted ‘click’ and overall, a
really good performer that offers something slightly different than
other Tour-driven models.
|
 |
 |
|
Contact: |
www.pingeurope.com |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Loft
options: |
47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58 and 60 degrees |
|
 |
 |
|
Price: |
£90 (steel), £105 (graphite) |
|
 |
| Ping says: The Tour-W
wedges feature a tungsten weight in
the toe to increase the MOI (moment of inertia) and improve
forgiveness. Using high-density material allows the club to be slightly
smaller for increased playability from various conditions. Vertical
custom tuning port, moves centre of gravity down and forward for
correct clubhead rotation at impact while patented hosel notch controls
the bend point for precise loft and lie adjustments for custom fitting.
Multiple bounce options offer a more precise fit for an assortment of
swing styles and turf conditions. Available in a brushed silver chrome
and black nickel chrome finish.
Lynton says: I liked the
compact, if slightly chunky head, which framed the ball nicely at
address. Feel was exceptionally soft, probably enhanced by
the insert in the back of the head. It was a solid all round performer,
working well from the fringe and on full shots from 100 yards out. The
clubhead also cut through sand - wet from overnight rain - get the ball
up quickly and stop.
|

Ping Tour W wedge
|
|
Lee says:Most golfers either love or hate Ping irons
and
wedges. Before this test I was definitely in the latter
camp, having never really warmed to their chunky look. But this wedge
has changed my opinion completely and I really enjoyed using it. It sat
well behind the ball and had a comfortable weight to it. It
checked the ball up quickly on both greenside chips and full shots into
the green and was an efficient tool from the sand. My favourite club of
the
batch.
Nick says: As the current owner of a 52-degree Ping
Tour wedge – albeit a two-year old model – I was keen to see how the W
wedge compared. After a thorough test from all lies and distances I’ve
no hesitation in saying that these are a marked improvement on what was
already a pretty decent wedge. The look is pretty conventional, but the
feel is much softer – almost forged-like - and I got none of the
harsh contact that I sometimes get with the Tour model.
Spin was right up there with the best of them, and they felt
really solid on full shots, flying high and stopping quickly. By far
Ping’s best effort with a wedge.
|
 |
 |
|
Contact: |
www.titleist.co.uk |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Loft
options: |
54, 56, 58 and 60 degrees. |
|
 |
 |
|
Price: |
£90
(graphite) |
|
 |
| Titleist says: By working with Tour players to create
wedges that perform under the most challenging conditions, Bob Vokey
has developed a precisely-machined, tight-tolerance groove that
provides the player with increased spin on both full and partial shots.
Featuring a CNC machined cut face and grooves, the SM wedges have 30 per
cent more groove volume than a conventional wedge to provide more
consistent and higher spin, particularly from grassy lies and wet
conditions. Heads made from mild carbon steel with a chrome or oil can
finish..
Lynton says: Been seriously considering investing in a
set of these wedges, as my old set of Snake
Eyes wedges are coming to the end of their natural life. My thorough
testing of these 56- and 60-degree models confirmed my expectations -
seriously well made and performing brilliantly from all types of lie.
The head slides under the ball easily to produce high floaters as well
as hard-spinning knockdowns, offering bags control.
Feel great off the face and offer plenty of feedback so you
immediately know when you've hit a good one (and a bad one!)
Half the attraction of Vokey wedges is making me aspire to
being a better wedge player and in that respect I’ll be digging into my
pockets very soon – especially as they have come down in price.
|

Titleist Vokey spinn-milled wedge
|
|
Lee says: I liked the overall classical look and feel
and was impressed with the spin rates and
bite-ability although they sometimes generated so
much spin that I sometimes wished they’d run out a little more. It’s
something I'd need to get used to but overall - they offered a solid,
pure feel when hit out of the middle but not as forgiving as some of the
others.
Nick says: Vokey wedges have inspired a cult-like
following for many years among good wedge players - they're a true
players’ wedges, offering spin-a-plenty in an eye-pleasing package.
Placed in the hands of a 13 handicapper their powers are slightly
dimmed, as my ability to spin it on a sixpence isn’t quite up there
with the best
of them. But the milled face – between the
grooves – means that every part of the clubface is working towards
generating more ball control and more spin. Even mid-handicappers will
benefit from its design. Hard to fault on all performance fronts, it
didn’t have the curb appeal of some other models. The opposition is
catching up fast but Vokeys are still the golf industry standard in my
opinion.
|
 |
| Cleveland says:
Tour-inspired shape, sole and offset. CG14 wedges also feature
vibration dampening Gelback technology - a lightweight, material behind
the hitting zone in the
back cavity to remove vibration on miss-hits and deliver better
feedback. Wider sole improves contact on full shots, reduces 'digging'
and special sole grind delivers crisper contact and turf-cutting power.
Milling technology of Zip Grooves channels more debris than traditional
grooves at impact. Available in standard and low bounce options.
Lynton says: I love the
overall look of the CG14 wedge, which I found both visually appealing
and inspiring confidence at address. I was able to generate lots of
spin on shots around the green, even though we were using two-piece
Callaway balls in the
short game practice area. I liked the gunmetal finish,
which looked classy and gave me plenty of feel of the
centre of the clubface.
Produced consistent trajectory and
spin with plenty of height on full shots from either grass or sand. One
of my favourite clubs from the group we tested.
|

Cleveland CG14 wedge
|
|
Steve says: Already owner of a Cleveland CG10 wedge, I
was really looking forward to judging the difference. In looks it was
quite fussy for a Tour players' wedge,
but not offensive as the yellow colouring in the
back cavity is hidden from view at address. Had a nice weight and look
to it at address and offered good levels of spin. Is this a feature of the
new Zip
Grooves or just that it was brand new? Wasn't the best performer in the
sand for me but worked best with full shots and chips from the fringe.
Overall not such a drastic improvement from my old
set of CG10 wedges so not convinced to upgrade yet.
Nick says: Shape-wise looks less rounded than
previous designs, which makes it seem more playable and in line with
other Tour models. Slight cavity back is concealed well and the large
face inspires confidence at address. Chrome finish on the model tested
is very shiny but there’s also a black model for those that don't wish
to risk reflection.
Gelback technology certainly made the club feel less harsh
than other models and minor miss-hits weren’t punished too much. The
sole and leading edge is very smooth and seemed to
slide over the turf or through the grass quite nicely. With the low
bounce it's more versatile and easier to pull off lob shots, too. The
Zip
Grooves deliver good bite with balls landing
softly on full shots, while checking quickly on lower
trajectory shots. A really nice club.
|
| TaylorMade says: A revamped
version of the successful rac wedge, the Z-TP is designed to be more
versatile with a Tour-proven C grind sole making it easier to open the
face to play a variety of greenside shots. Combines classic teardrop
shape with large 'Feel Pockets' behind the face to channel away any
impact vibration. Milled Z grooves – 10 per cent bigger than Y grooves
- for more stopping power. Smoked PVD finish to reduce glare and
promotes focus at address. .
Lynton says: First impression
is that the Z-TP is refreshingly heavier than other models we tested.
The weight gave a better feel for where the clubhead is in the swing,
as well as making it the most powerful when hitting full shots from the
fairway. Exceptionally solid feel, especially from the sand, with the
extra weight helping to dig the ball out from even plugged lies. Really
impressed. Only just behind the Vokey and the Cleveland in
overall performance.
|

TaylorMade ZTP wedge
|
|
Lee says: Clean looks, good feel with the twin cavities
in the compact head inspiring lots of confidence. Even though it had 12
degrees of bounce I
found it easier to hit off tight lies than models with less bounce and
it was by far the best performer from the sand. My clear runner-up.
Nick says: I was really taken with the whole package -
cool, retro looks and a classy gunmetal finish. Plenty of care has been
taken in design to
appeal to good players as well as aspiring players. Sets up well behind
the ball
From short chips to full-swing approach shots, the ball
left the face softly, with no sting from miss-hits. This 56-degree
model functioned perfectly as a sand wedge yet still sat nicely on
tight fairway lies. Nicely weighted and well balanced with Z grooves
producing more than adequate stopping power. A great wedge.
|
 |
| Nike says: The profile,
bounce and groove contour of the SV
Tour wedges are derived from extensive feedback from
Nike’s Tour staff. Made from feel-enhancing 8620 carbon
steel they feature classic profiles and grinds and provide
a clean look at address and maximum versatility. A CNC-milled, flat face provides consistent ball response off the
clubface for more accurate shots. Comes with High Flex
Point Dynamic Gold S400 steel shafts.
Lynton says: Head looks large
and quite cumbersome in comparison to other models on test. Higher
handicappers might find this appealing but I found it a off-putting and
too rounded. Both
chrome and nickel finishes felt quite soft off the
face but I had to hit the ball a tad harder to get the distance I
achieved with other models. Plenty of spin, however,
especially on those low trajectory chips from around the
fringe, which delivered plenty of control for precise shots
to the flag.
|

Nike SV Tour wedge
|
|
Lee says: The uncomplicated head framed the ball well
at
address and gave the feeling that it would be hard to
miss-hit it. Gave me lots of spin around the greens
and checked up well when struck crisply and firmly. It lost
a bit of its control on the longer shots from 80 yards out,
and wasn’t the most consistent performer, making you really
work to get the maximum out of it.
Nick says: Traditional-looking, classy head with a soft
feel at impact and
plenty of spin from all lies and surfaces. The
grind on the sole made it easy to open up the face
and get the clubhead under the ball for high lob shots.
Didn’t really set the pulses racing, it’s
clearly a solid performer, without being top drawer.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |

All the clubs we tested fell into the
£80-£90 price bracket, and although you can find them
cheaper if you look in the right places, they are premium
wedges, using carbon steel to offer soft feel and precise
control and head shapes inspired by Tour players on the manufacturers'
staff.
But make no mistake, these wedges are designed for
good iron players, not high handicappers, so if you’re looking for
forgiveness then try
cavity-backed models. While cosmetic looks has a big
influence on shelf appeal, these are precision tools, so weight and
balance are all vital.
|
Lee (left) and Lynton
fire off their wedge samples
|
|
Ping and Titleist have both maintained their
status
as serious wedge makers with their latest models, while
Cleveland, which once dominated the market, has, it seems shifted
slightly away from its classic look to a more fashionable design with
its CG14, which might upset the purists. Callaway and Nike, both
relative
newcomers in the stand-alone wedge market, are clearly
making good progress, and it’s especially good to see
Callaway opting for a forged model.
|

Lee checks out a wedge
from sand
|
|
What this test proved is that it’s vital to get
the right bounce on your wedges to suit the conditions your playing in,
from the type of sand, thickness of the rough and general consistency
of the fairways. Too much degree of bounce (the curved flange behind
the head) makes the club difficult to nip the ball off firm fairways,
too little bounce gives a tendency for leading edges to dig into soft
fairways and fluffy bunkers.
The other key to getting the right wedge set up
is to have
enough clubs to cover all the distance gaps, so that there
are no glaring holes say from the 80- or 100-yard mark. In
addition to a PW (48), a 52-, 56- and 60-degree wedge would
be about right for most mid to low handicappers,
although a 50-, 54- and 58-degreee wedge will also provide a uniform
distance separation.
Golf at Goodwood
*Our thanks to Golf at Goodwood, near Chichester
in West
Sussex, for providing the practice facilities for our test
and for the use of the magnificient Downland course. For
more details visit
www.goodwood.co.uk or call Tom Munt on
01243 755144 for details on memberships, tee times on the
Park course, as well as corporate and society bookings.
 |
 |
 |
 |
*We want to know about the clubs in your bag - as well as the balls,
shoes, waterproofs. Submit a user
review to help other discerning golfers make good purchasing decisions. |
|
Discuss this story
I currently carry PW, SW and Mizuno MX 51 deg gap and 60 deg lob - 4 in all. I paid £59 for the MX wedges but to be honest if I was replacing my irons/wedges next time (still a few years away), I think I would cut it down to PW, gap and sand wedges with equal spacing. I would be willing to pay whatever for wedges to match the irons. More money than sense
Posted: 01/08/2008 12:08
OH god.... I've confessed to this in another thread but here goes. In my bag I've got two callaway x-tour 52 and 58 deg, these replaced 3 mizuno mp-t 52, 56 and 60 deg but decided that I could get away with a 58 instead of the 56 and 60 thereby carrying one less club. But in my garage I have 2 new callway x-forged 52 and 58 deg and also 2 new mizuno mp-r 52 and 56 wedges... I'm a bit like phil mickelson who changes his wedges every 6 months, only difference is I don't have the talent !! I don't knowwhy but I feel I need to change my wedges often, don't do it with putters or drivers or anything else though.
Posted: 01/08/2008 12:22
I'm currently trialing an old school 3 wedge system after carrying 4 for most of the past two years. I'm now using my mx20 PW, a 52* Wishon PCF GW and a Mizuno MP R 56/10 SW. To me it's silly to spend a fortune on a wedge when you can build your own fantastic component wedges for next to nothing. The Wishon I carry is equal to any of those on test yet cost me 35 quid to build and I could choose a nice Nippon NSPro shaft instead of the horrible Dynamic Gold in yukky wedge flex you get lumbered with with virtually everything on the market. I only play the Mizzy MP R because it was cheap on ebay and came with a Rifle 4.5 shaft.
Posted: 01/08/2008 13:33
I have a 46* PW and 50* UW (aka Gap wedge) as part of my iron set (Ping G5). Above that, I play either a 54.12 Cleveland CG11 (£60) and 58.10 Mizuno MP-T (£50) combo or a 56.16 Benross VX Forged (£22), depending on how many slots I have free. I haven't played the Benross enough to have a strong opinion on it yet - it has nice feel but its extremely high bounce combined with a weighty feel really makes it a club purely for sand or thick rough. I took a while to get used to the CG11, which feels very chunky at address, but it's now quite a trusted part of my bag. The Mizzy is still a thing of beauty even after more than a year, but a fickle mistress who either makes me look like a golf legend or dumps me in the brown stuff. I'm not much of a gear tart and am not looking to change any of them soon: the only outlay I'm considering in this area is whether to have a graphite shaft put in the CG11 to better match my irons, but I don't think I'll dare meddle with it any time soon. If I was going to buy another one, it would probably be an SMT as the one I bought my Dad feels fantastic and they're half the price of a Vokey.
Posted: 01/08/2008 13:33
I have 3 MD Golf Superstrong wedges (52, 54 and 60). They retail at around £50, but can be bought for £40 in many places. They are superb, and as a result would baulk at paying more. I have the 54 and 60 in my bag, but need to get myself a 56, so I can have a 3 wedge system (PWs don't count as wedges these days).
Posted: 01/08/2008 13:42
I recently bought a SMT,53 degree "gap" wedge from Big Hit Golf for £39 if I recall correctly. It looks great, is easy to use and spins the ball prodigiously if I hit it full. My most recent addition is a truly beautiful MD Golf Norman Drew 'Signature"48 degree wedge(£50) with minimum bounce since the wedge in my Srixon XX10s is a horrible object unlike all the other irons. The new wedge also produces lots of spin. Both the above cost me nothing due to selling an unwanted putter and trolley bag on eBay! My sand iron is a Yonex PM (Phil Mickelson)56 degree with 6 degree bounce which I should probably replace as it is designed for top quality bunkers as on the pro circuit, not your average Bedfordshire club bunker full of builder's sand! Finally, I have a Ryder 60 degree lob wedge which I bought half price( £8!!) in a sale in the pro shop of my former club. It is probably not the greatest lob wedge but it is great for lousy Bedfordshire bunkers!
Posted: 01/08/2008 14:09
I had the Callaway Big Bertha's (06 version) 50*, 55*, and 60* wedges, until last week when I replaced them With the Superb MD Golf Norman Drew Signature Wedges! a 52* and a 58* Truly a work of art the Finish and Performance is top Rate! and at under £40 each Great Value for money too! I now have an extra space in my bag too! Maybe I will carry another Utility or a 5 wood!
Posted: 01/08/2008 14:20
Budget Man cometh , After some very informative advice from Creosote where it was pointed out that my P/W was probably only 45 deg (and it is) that the gap between that and my Dunlop 65i 60 deg and 64 deg was too much, It was suggested that I needed a gap wedge , I took his advice and sourced 3 Acer wedges for the princely sum of £35 Inc P&P , I got a 52 deg a 56 deg and a 60 deg , and despite liking my 64deg it has left my bag. OK , they are budget wedges but given my skill level I don't think a prestege wedge would improve my skill by much , Creosote was correct with his advice and I have been hitting more greens and not struggling as much in trying to manufacture a shot with the wrong club , I have in fact managed to get backspin with the 56 and 60 deg wedges , something I've never been able to do before with any club , unfortunately the backspin has caused me to spin back in to 3 bunkers , but I will adjust for that in future , it does help stop running through some greens so its helping in that respect. I miss my 64 deg and if I can drop a club I'm sure it will find its way back in to my bag
Posted: 01/08/2008 16:12
I kinda agree with Niblick, I don't really count my PW as a wedge. To me it's more of a '10' iron, I play my PW like all my other short irons for mainly full shots whereas I tend to play my 'wedges' slightly differently (less than full with open stance). So on that basis I have 3 wedges 52/56/60 currently Nike SV Tours, together with my 10 iron  I probably paid around £80/£90 each for my current wedges but I don't think I'd pay that again. I have a solitary 58 deg SMT durometer with rifle spinner shaft. Not currently in the bag as it doesn't really balance with my other wedges but outperforms the Nike's. I'd be buying more of them if replacing and spending a lot less money!!
Posted: 01/08/2008 16:39
46 years old? My arse! You cheeky buggers........ i get that too, people making me out to be younger than i really am  your lucky, i turned into a Steve half way through the testing
Posted: 01/08/2008 20:21
4 wedges, R7 TP PW (47*), AW (Gap 51*), SW (55*) and a TP Satin 60*, 6* bounce lob wedge. Play the PW flat out only and flat out or 'feel' with the other 3 depending on shot required. Payed upto £75 each but will have these for a Loooong time now.
Posted: 01/08/2008 20:44
47 Miura PW - part of set. Guage design 52 and 58 SQBT1 wedges, with awesome spin. We are not talking titleist spin milled here. I now know how pro's do it and it is not ALL method, it is equipment.
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/pureforged/GaugeDesignGAS1SQBTGAS2Wedges/photo#5147616207321981170
£250 the pair
Posted: 01/08/2008 22:18
Niblick, I got the MD's for £37.50 eash from a friend who is has a Golf shop. He gave them to me for cost price. 
Posted: 01/08/2008 22:29
I need some of Geldaps wedges I have the Miura 47 P too, retail 51 RAC GW - which I love, an old and bit worn original 55 RAC y-cutter yellow flag - Miura forged (Sergios backup) and a retail Cally 59 MD. All fitted with S&F Satin PX. I would'nt want too much spin on a PW or GW but on a SW and LW I need max spin capability, especially for those partial shots inside 60yds around the green. May invest in some Guage wedges for my Burpday. Just got an Email from Titleist to say the new Vokey Tour Dept Special grind wedges are out $250 ea but I cant see if they have Spin Milled grooves....?
Posted: 01/08/2008 22:39
Niblick, I got the MD's for £37.50 eash from a friend who is has a Golf shop. He gave them to me for cost price. 
Gah!! I need better mates!
Posted: 01/08/2008 23:10
I've spent enough money in there over the years! and sent loads of new customers his way! The very least He could do me is the Odd Deal!
Posted: 01/08/2008 23:31
I have just added a Cleveland CG14 56 deg SW to my collection, the old Vokey was getting a bit worn out. Only tried it once on the course and haven't quite adjusted to it yet, once I have more feedback on it I will post a review.
Posted: 09/08/2008 10:33
|
|